<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-sci-res.net/inc/asr/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Science and Research</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-sci-res.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1992-0628</issn>
		<eissn>1992-0636</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<volume_title>8th EMS Annual Meeting and 7th European Conference on Applied Climatology 2008</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/asr-3-99-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-sci-res.net/3/99/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-sci-res.net/3/99/2009/asr-3-99-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-sci-res.net/3/99/2009/asr-3-99-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>99</start_page>
	<end_page>103</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-05-26</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Warning! The use of meteorological information during a flash-flood warning process</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. CrÃ©ton-Cazanave</name>
			<email>lcretoncazanave@gmail.com</email>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institut de GÃ©ographie Alpine, UniversitÃ© de Grenoble, 14bis avenue Marie Reynoard, 38000 Grenoble, France</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Warning is a key issue to reduce flash floods impacts. But, despite
many studies, local and national authorities still struggle to issue good
flash floods warnings. We will argue that this failure results from a
classical approach of warnings, based on a strict separation between the
&lt;i&gt;assessment world&lt;/i&gt; and the &lt;i&gt;action world&lt;/i&gt;. We will go further
than the previous criticisms (Pielke and Carbone, 2002) and show that forecasters,
decision makers, emergency services and local population have quite similar
practices during a flash-flood warning. Focusing on the use of meteorological
information in the warning process, our case study shows that more research
about the real practices of stakeholders would be another step towards
integrated studies.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Becker, H S.: Art worlds, University of California Press, 1984. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Carsell, K M., Pingel, N. D., and Ford, D. T.: Quantifying the benefit of a flood warning system, Nat. Hazards Rev., 5, 131â€“140, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Chateauraynaud, F. and Torny, D.: Les sombres prÃ©curseurs: une sociologie pragmatique de l&apos;alerte et du risque, EHESS, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Demuth, J L., Gruntfest, E., Morss, R E., Drobot, S., and Lazo, J K.: WAS*IS: Building a Community for Integrating Meteorology and Social Science, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 1729â€“1737, http://dx.doi.org/10.1175%2FBAMS-88-11-1729, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Drabek, T E.: Understanding Disaster Warning Responses, The Social Science Journal, 36, 515â€“523, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Drobot, S. and Parker, D.: Advances and challenges in flash flood warnings, Environmental Hazards, 7, 173â€“178, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Hornus, H. and Martin, X.: Retour d&apos;expÃ©rience sur la vigilance crue et son intÃ©gration dans le dispositif de crise lors des Ã©vÃ©nements pluviaux du 6 au 9 septembre 2005 dans le gard et l&apos;hÃ©rault., Tech. rep., IGE, MEDD, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> McGrenere, J. and Ho, W.: Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept, in: Graphics Interface, 179â€“186, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Montz, B E. and Gruntfest, E.: Flash flood mitigation : recommendations for research and applications, Environmental Hazards, 4, 15â€“22, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Morss, R E., Wilhelmi, O V., Downton, M W., and Gruntfest, E.: Flood risk, uncertainty, and scientific information for decision making, BAMS, 86, 1593â€“1601, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Morss, R E., Demuth, J L., and Lazo, J K.: Communicating uncertainty in weather forecasts: A survey of the US public, Wea. Forecast., 23, 974â€“991, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Nachi, M.: Introduction Ã   la sociologie pragmatique: vers un nouveau &quot;style&quot; sociologique?, Armand Colin, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Pielke, R. and Carbone, R E.: Weather impacts, forecasts, and policy, BAMS, 83, 393â€“406, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Sorensen, J H.: Hazard Warning Systems : Review of 20 years of progress, Nat. Hazards Rev., 1, 119â€“125, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Stewart, T R., Pielke, R J., and Nath, R.: Understanding user decision making and the value of improved precipitation forecasts, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 85, 223â€“235, 2004. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

