<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.adv-sci-res.net/inc/asr/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Advances in Science and Research</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.adv-sci-res.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1992-0628</issn>
		<eissn>1992-0636</eissn>
		<volume_number>3</volume_number>
		<volume_title>8th EMS Annual Meeting and 7th European Conference on Applied Climatology 2008</volume_title>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/asr-3-13-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.adv-sci-res.net/3/13/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.adv-sci-res.net/3/13/2009/asr-3-13-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.adv-sci-res.net/3/13/2009/asr-3-13-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>13</start_page>
	<end_page>16</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-04-01</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Selected results of a model validation exercise</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>M. Piringer</name>
			<email>martin.piringer@zamg.ac.at</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>K. Baumann-Stanzer</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics, Vienna, Austria</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The concentration fields calculated with three Gaussian models and one
Lagrangian dispersion model are validated against a set of SF&lt;sub&gt;6&lt;/sub&gt;
concentration data provided by the German environmental programme BWPLUS.
The source was a pig fattening unit in fairly flat terrain. The results
reveal that, in flat terrain with steady undisturbed flow, the use of Gauss
models is still justified, whereas Lagrangian models should be used whenever
the flow is modified by obstacles or topography.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Bächlin, W., Rühling, A., and Lohmeyer, A.: Bereitstellung von Validierungsdaten für Geruchsausbreitungsmodelle – Naturmessungen. Forschungsbericht FZKA-BWPLUS, Förderkennzeichen BWE 20003, 183 pp., 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Baumann-Stanzer, K., Piringer, M., Polreich, E., Hirtl, M., Petz, E., and Bügelmayer, M.: User experience with model validation exercises. Ext abstract of the 12th Int. Conf. on Harmonization within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, Cavtat, Croatia, 6–10 October 2008, in: Croatian Meteorological Journal, 43, 1, 52–56, ISSN 1330-0083, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> CERC (Cambridge Environmental Research Consultants): ADMS 3, Version~3.1, User Guide, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Chang, J. C. and Hanna, S. R.: Air quality model performance evaluation, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 87, 1–3, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Hanna, S. R., Chang, J., Britter, R., and Neophytou, M.: Overview of Model Evaluation History and Procedures in the Atmospheric Air Quality Area, QNET-CFD Network Newsletter, 2, 5, 1–4, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Hirtl, M. and Baumann-Stanzer, K.: Evaluation of two dispersion models (ADMS-Roads and LASAT) applied to street canyons in Stockholm, London and Berlin, Atmos. Environ., 41, 5959–5971, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Hirtl, M., Baumann-Stanzer, K., Kaiser, A., Petz, E., and Rau, G.: Evaluation of three dispersion models for the Trbovlje power plant, Slovenia, Proceedings of the 11th Int. Conf. on Harmonisation, 2–5.7.2007, Cambridge, UK, 21–25, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Janicke Consulting: LASAT Reference book for Version 3.0, www.janicke.de, 210 pp., 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> ÖNorm M9440: Ausbreitung von luftverunreinigenden Stoffen in der Atmosphäre. Berechnung von Immissionskonzentrationen und Ermittlung von Schornsteinhöhen, Österreichisches Normeninstitut, Fachnormenausschuss 139 – Luftreinhaltung, 1992/96. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Pechinger, U. and Petz, E.: Model evaluation of the Austrian Gaussian model ON M9440: comparison with the Copenhagen and the Lillestrom datasets, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 8, Nos 3–6, 287–294, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Piringer, M., Petz, E., Groehn, I., and Schauberger, G.: A sensitivity study of separation distances calculated with the Austrian Odour Dispersion Model (AODM), Atmos. Environ., 41, 1725–1735, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Schatzmann, M. and Britter, R. (Eds.): Proceedings of an International Workshop on Quality Assurance of Microscale Meteorological Models. COST Action 732 and ESF, Hamburg, Germany, 28/29 July2005, 150 pp., ISBN 3-00-018312-4, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Schauberger, G., Piringer, M., and Petz, E.: Calculating direction – dependant separation distance by a dispersion model to avoid livestock odour annoyance, Biosyst. Eng., 82, 25–37, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Schauberger, G., Piringer, M., and Petz, E.: Diurnal and annual variation of the sensation distance of odour emitted by livestock buildings calculated by the Austrian odour dispersion model (AODM), Atmos. Environ., 34, 4839–4851, 2000. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

